| |
At
Powdermill Nature Reserve, differences in stream quality between
unpolluted Powdermill Run and acidified Laurel Run adjacent
to it have provided an excellent opportunity to study the
possible effects of acid mine drainage pollution (AMD) of
headwater streams on the demographics, behavioral ecology,
productivity, and survivorship of populations of an obligate
riparian songbird, the Louisiana Waterthrush (Seiurus motacilla;
LOWA).
The LOWA
feeds mostly on aquatic macroinvertebrates, many of which
cannot survive or reproduce in acid-polluted streams. Powdermill
Run is a pH-neutral stream, has abundant macroinvertebrates,
and supports diverse fish populations. Laurel Run, which is
impacted by drainage from two abandoned coal mines, is acidic
(pH 4.0-5.0), with high levels of dissolved aluminum and iron,
has reduced macroinvertebrate diversity and density, and supports
no fish.
Studies
were begun in 1996 by Robert
S. Mulvihill, Field Ornithology Projects Coordinator
to determine whether or not pollution of Laurel Run affects
the breeding density, reproductive success, foraging behavior,
and/or survivorship of Louisiana Waterthrushes by reducing
the diversity, abundance, and/or biomass of invertebrate prey
available to them during the breeding season. Preliminary
results of the study showed that the number of territories,
pairing success, and nesting densities of LOWAs nesting along
the acidified stream were lower. In the first year, we found
only four territories and 50% pairing success in Laurel Run
compared to 11 territories and 91% pairing success for the
same reach length of Powdermill Run (see Mulvihill, R. S.,
1997, The Louisiana Waterthrush and Our Mountain Streams,
Carnegie Magazine May/June:62-65).
The study
was continued in 1997 with partial funding from Pennsylvania's
Wild Resource Conservation Fund (WRCF). At the end of 1997,
two sources of AMD on Laurel Run were partially remediated
using passive treatment technologies (see Gangewere, R. J.,
1998, Saving Our Mountain Streams, Carnegie Magazine
January/February:8-12, 36-39). Funding from WRCF for fieldwork
in 1998 enabled us to continue to monitor changes in the Laurel
Run LOWA and macroinvertebrate populations in response to
anticipated improvement in stream quality resulting from these
treatments. Additional funding for the LOWA study in 1999
and 2000 came from the Loyalhanna Watershed Association and
the Rea Research Fund of Carnegie Musuem of Natural History.
Remediation
of Laurel Run is ongoing and before long we expect to see
LOWA numbers there increase to levels similar to those observed
on Laurel's unimpacted sister stream, Powdermill Run, signalling
that the ecological balance of this picturesque stream has
been substantially restored after more than 50 years of degradation. |
|